Military Issues Essay

My interpretation of war machine drawing cards before I was enrolled into SF0002 was to hands down associate the word bunking with Leader as it is how majority of us (superiors and peers) interpret it to be and I do not know the exposition of Military and Non-military Leadership. later going through just lesson wizard of SF0002, to my astonishment, I complete that the wrong definition of Military Leadership meet became a gospel truth to most of us. The start-off brainstorm that I hold back gained from SF0002 is, that Leadership is not equivalent to a Leader. With the aid of the Leadership concept, Ive identified that Leadership is not virtually me or my superiors it is nearly(predicate) a action involving my ability to influence my subordinates to accomplish missions and achieve outcome in various tasks/projects with a be sickting green purpose. In comparison, both Military and Non-military Leadership similarly defines overhaul as a process to influence. However , to set them, military drawing cardship uniquely employs the use of doctrinal methods to explain loss get hold ofership in a military context.In Singapore, it is identified as the Leadership 24/7 frame attain. To translate the framework into a personalised context, I must influence my peers and masteryers to understand the SAFs Mission and Purpose, our direct environment (airspace constraints and concerns) and achieve Mission success, be it high train events (NDP, multinational conferences etc.) or daily operations (routine controlling). Having said that, I must first align my values to the RSAF core values, sharpen my leadership competencies. With knowledge, charisma and determination, I will be able to command respect and influence those some me to work towards a reciprocal objective. I am currently a underlying Officer in my unit. Two of my primary objectives are to invent cohesions and police squad up building programmes. The Cardinal police squads interpretatio n of tackiness is similar to Team Building. afterwards going through SF0002, I realized that the Cardinal team is heading towards a wrong direction.When tasked to organize a team building programme, we will associate it with team bonding and unity. The stand by insight which I have gained from SF0002 is the differences between coherency and Team Building. Cohesion involves what the my team is working on, such as building bonds and uniting people. However, Cardinal is all about having fun and getting together to know individually other better. Team Building differs greatly from Cohesion. There are on the whole 2 dimensions and a team outcome in the military team building framework.The task related dimension climb ups the teams ability, to disposition the individual roles and functionalities of the team as well as formulating plans and strategies to achieve common objectives. The teamwork dimension invents the teams relationship and establishing rules to govern the teams beha vior and conduct. Team outcome defines the teams vision and cultivations, which canister be tangible or intangible. Viewing the context of the military team building framework, it claims understanding team building more than comprehensive and Im able to share with my superiors and peers on how to organize a team building programme more effectively.Judging from The Five Factor perplex of personality, under Correlation with Leadership criteria Extraversion and Conscientiousness factors predicts leadership emergence well, Agreeableness and Emotional Stability however are propensity towards Leadership Effectiveness and neutral for Openness. In my case, I score an norm for Extraversion and low for Conscientiousness. With regard to Extraversion, I am precise affable and assertive when it comes to peers whom I am close to and I tend to be more reserved and quiet during the initial get to know phrase. besides for Openness, I will only open up to close friends and never to strange rs. Therefore, my score for Openness is slightly low. As for Conscientiousness, I do not cope with with my score because my superiors and peers estimate of me as a ponderousworking and ripe person. However, I do agree that I am not a very organized person as I find it dispute to juggle my work.I believe that my score should be somewhere near average. My score for Emotional Stability is very low, I can agree with that as I tend to facial expression very nervous, lack of boldness and I get depressed very easily. I believe its because of my desire to be a perfectionist therefore I tend to put all the blame on myself when certain things does not go my demeanor (attain only silver for IPPT etc.). As for Agreeableness, I scored an average. I am a caring and cooperative person in general. However, I tend to protest a lot with my peers and superiors ideas and way of handling situations because I always feel that there has to be a better way out. This constant hold for a better wa y out coincides with my desire to be a perfectionist under Emotional Stability. Leadership emergence defines that the emergence of a leader is being decided by others purely based on his carrying into action typically temporary and lack of concrete facts. Leadership Effectiveness defines the effect of a leader in influencing his peers and soldiers to work towards a common goal. I believe my Leadership potential is leaning more towards Leadership Effectiveness.It is hard for soulfulness to determine my personal traits initially, but in a yen run, my demonstration of concern and determination will gibe and motivate them to work towards a common goal of improving the organization. Leadership behavioral skills revolves close to chore, coition and Change (TRC) Behaviors. Task behavior is short term and focussed those who relies heavily on resources (people) and technologies to achieve high productivity. Relations behaviors rely on a persons ability to establish strong bonds with their peers and inspire commitment to work towards a common goal. Change behaviors those who aims to develop and change the organization. TRC analysis provides a comprehensive read to define a leaders behavior. 14 behavioral skills organized into 5 main competencies in the SAF Leadership Competencies Framework (LCM) develops a leaders ability to influence, think critically and creatively in a stressful environment, fudge decisions effectively and execute them efficiently, develop junior leaders, teams and improve organization. Most importantly, a leader must first master the Self meta-competency in order to develop the other 4 competencies because it develops ones will and determination to learn.Task behavior can be related to Mission and Conceptual thought process Competencies. A leader must possess the ability to plan and make critically decisions, and display ethical reasoning to convince people instanter in order to develop a high level of efficiency. Likewise, Relation beh avior can be related to Social and Self (Meta) competencies. A Leader must first self-manage and have a high level of self-awareness in order to be able to sensitively communicate with their pursual at their level, inspiring the followers commitment and cooperation to develop a common goal. Finally, Change behavior can be related to Developmental competency. A leader must encourage the people and team to develop modernistic and creative thinking, with the common intent to aim to develop and improving the organization.After going through SF0002, it definitely enhanced my knowledge on Leadership. I now perceive Leadership in terms of doctrines and academics. Academically, Leadership is a process rather than solely about the leader or someone who holds a management or executive position. Leadership is a process whereby a leader is highly adaptable, in whatever context depute to him, is able to influence his followers to achieve outcomes and purpose of the context. Doctrinally, Leade rship is about understanding the context and development of oneself. To further elaborate on self-development, a SAF Leaders must align their personal values with the SAF core values, have a good understanding on individual competencies and style of leading, and must be self-aware and manage oneself accordingly. SAF leaders must similarly be able to influence his/her followers to understand the SAFs Mission and Purpose, declare the type of environment we are operating in and the desired outcomes or goal we must achieve.Thus far, majority of our tasks are peace meter operations. Its easier to lead and influence in peacetime, where there is minimal stress and lives are not directly at risk. It gives a leader more time to make decisions and think. Leadership is important in the SAF because we are a military organization, and someday, we expertness be activated to go to war. All of us, Leaders, will be irrelevant as of how to lead our soldiers on the battle field. In a war, what see ms to be the most important to most people out there is the equipment, queen and size of combat force. However, many neglect the most essential dig which is Leadership Leadership inspires a leaders commitment to lead and influence the soldiers by providing them with a clear direction and purpose towards their goals or objectives through determination and perseverance which are the main sources of victory.Before tending SF0002, my purpose as a military leader in the SAF is about helping soldiers to understand why they ought to serve the Nation. In turn, helping them to fully utilize the duration of their liability as an National servicing Freshmen (NSF). After attending SF0002, my purpose as a military leader in the SAF is to assume responsibility of my soldiers training, morale, discipline and fighting spirit. This involves maintaining/upgrading their skills and proficiency level therefore, develop a high state of operational readiness. My purpose is also to develop a good rel ationships with my soldiers and the team, so as to ensure that they are affiliated and determined to achieve a common goal be it complementary a task or securing mission objectives.1. For me, a meaningful insight from SF0002 is, Military Leadership is not equivalent to a Leader. 2. For me, a significant insight from SF0002 is, the differences between Cohesion and Team Building. 1. Lesson 1 entitled The perception and Practice of Military Leadership. 2. Lesson 7 entitled Science and Practice of leading Military Teams.Leadership means to lead, excel and overcome. Firstly, in order to lead effectively, I must gain the repect of my men. With that, can I exercise command and control, effectively and efficiently. Without leadership, a leader will lead with the power of the rank. men under me will follow orders unwillingly and blindly, instead of understanding the precept behind why orders are delivered so as to execute them more efficiently. My purpose as a military leader is to ens ure the well-being and safety of my men during peacetime training and ensure that I lead them by example. Military leadership matters in the SAF because there will always be men enlisting and recruited into the force, these people need a leader to guide them through their career or 2 years of their National Service liability. Without a leader with leadership qualities, men will not give the importance of serving the force, they do not have a goal or a clear vision. In general, as leaders, we should try our very best to align our mens values with the SAF core values. It is also my duty to ensure they have a meaningful and purposeful time with the SAF.